📝 Detailed Answer
Many people are curious about remote herbal prescriptions these days. I also wondered if it would work at first. Let me start with the advantages. First, you are not limited by time or location. It is convenient for those who travel frequently or find it difficult to visit Daejeon in person. Second, initial consultation costs and waiting times are reduced. Third, after the prescription, you can easily adjust via text or video, making it easier to maintain consistent care. On the other hand, there are clear disadvantages. In remote consultations, we make the most of tongue photos, questionnaires, and existing test results, but without direct pulse diagnosis (脈診), it is difficult to accurately assess traditional Korean medical conditions such as spleen deficiency (脾虛). When spleen function weakens, the body tends to swell and feel fatigued, but without pulse assessment, it is hard to gauge the severity. Additionally, objective data such as abdominal examination and body composition analysis cannot be directly verified, making it challenging to distinguish between edema and body fat patterns. If factors like blood stasis (瘀血) or phlegm-fluid retention (痰飮) are suspected, an in-person evaluation is even more reassuring. In conclusion, 'it depends on the situation.' For example, if you already know your constitution and underlying conditions well and only need mild diet support, a remote consultation may be fine. However, if you have complex symptoms or have experienced side effects from previous Western diet medications, it is safer to visit in person at least once for a pulse diagnosis. When I recommend remote consultations, I always advise, 'In such cases, it is better to come in first.' It is not a one-size-fits-all approach; it is important to weigh the pros and cons according to the patient's situation.